X80管线钢在ISO标准下不同试样CTOD特征值的差异研究

王学仕; 李轶鹏; 刘金玲; 陈小伟; 王强

doi:10.19938/j.steelpipe.1001-2311.2024.6.13.17

X80管线钢在ISO标准下不同试样CTOD特征值的差异研究

1. 中国石油集团渤海石油装备制造有限公司, 天津 300457;
2. 中国石油集团东方地球物理勘探有限责任公司, 河北涿州 072751

详细信息

作者简介:
王学仕(1991-),男,工程师,主要从事焊接钢管的研发及试验工作。

计量
- 文章访问数: 68
- HTML全文浏览量: 5
- PDF下载量: 32
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-10-06
- 修回日期: 2024-05-13

Study on Differences of CTOD Characteristic Values between Different Specimens of X80 Linepipe Steel Prepared as per ISO Standard

1. CNPC Bohai Petroleum Equipment Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300457, China;
2. BGP INC., China National Petroleum Corporation, Zhuozhou 072751, China

摘要

摘要: 针对X80钢级22 mm管线钢钢板取开侧槽与不开侧槽的三点弯曲试样进行裂纹尖端张开位移（CTOD）试验测试，并按照ISO 12135∶2021标准计算，分析两类试样的CTOD特征值结果差异，同时对主要试验参数力F、V_p对CTOD特征值的影响进行初步研究。结果表明，开侧槽的三点弯曲试样的CTOD特征值较小，而不开侧槽的三点弯曲试样的CTOD特征值较大，V_p对于CTOD特征值的影响远大于力F。这项结论可以为采用不同样式的三点弯曲试样进行的CTOD测试产生的不同实验结果提供一定的实验依据。
- 管线钢 /
- X80 /
- 侧槽 /
- CTOD特征值 /
- 裂纹尖端张开位移
Abstract: The crack tip opening displacement （CTOD） test is conducted to the X80 linepipe steel plate with the-point ending straight notch compact tensile specimen，and the step notch compact tensile specimen. And then according to the calculation as per ISO 12135∶2021，the difference between the CTOD characteristic values of the said two types of specimens are analyzed，and meanwhile the effects on the CTOD characteristic values by the main testing parameters，i. e. the forces F and V_p are preliminarily studied. The results reveal that：the CTOD characteristic values of the three-point bent specimen with side grooves are smaller，whereas the CTOD characteristic values of the three-point bent specimen without side grooves are larger. The influence of Force V_p on the CTOD characteristic value is so much greater than that of Force F. This conclusion provides a certain experimental basis for the different experimental results as generated by the CTOD testing with the three-point-bent specimens with different sample types.
- linepipe steel /
- X80 /
- side groove /
- CTOD characteristic value /
- crack tip opening displacement

HTML全文

参考文献(17)

[1]	关鹏涛,李相清,郑三龙,等. ASTM和ISO标准断裂韧度测试方法比较研究[J]. 机械工程学报,2017,53(6):60-67. GUAN Pengtao,LI Xiangqing,ZHENG Sanlong,et al. Study and comparison of test method for measurement of fracture toughness between ASTM and ISO standards[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2017,53(6):60-67.
[2]	张强,徐诚,章伟,等. 国内外标准中裂纹尖端张开位移的计算结果差异[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2023,59(2):25-27,46. ZHANG Qiang,XU Cheng,ZHANG Wei,et al. Difference of calculation results of crack tip opening displacement in domestic and foreign standards[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis(Part A:Physical Testing),2023,59(2):25-27,46.
[3]	苗张木,王振宇. 厚钢板焊接接头韧性CTOD试验评定技术及应用[J]. 宽厚板,2006,12(6):23-28. MIAO Zhangmu,WANG Zhenyu. Assessment technique of CTOD experiment for welding joint toughness of heavy plate and its application[J]. Wide and Heavy Plate,2006,12(6):23-28.
[4]	孙洋洋,孔维拯. 裂纹尖端张开位移(CTOD)允许值研究[J]. 钢结构,2015,30(8):34-37. SUN Yangyang,KONG Weizheng. Research of CTOD allowable value[J]. Steel Construction,2015,30(8):34-37.
[5]	苗张木,陶德馨,杨荣英,等. 焊接接头韧度CTOD评定的适用性与允许值研究[J]. 机械强度,2006,28(1):150-154. MIAO Zhangmu,TAO Dexin,YANG Rongying,et al. Exploration on applicability and acceptable values in CTOD toughness evaluation for welded joints[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength,2006,28(1):150-154.
[6]	王元清,武延民,石永久,等. 温度对结构钢材裂纹尖端张开位移(CTOD)的影响分析[J]. 工程力学,2006,23(4):74-78. WANG Yuanqing,WU Yanmin,SHI Yongjiu,et al. Influence of low temperature on crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) of structural steel[J]. Engineering Mechanics,2006,23(4):74-78.
[7]	徐斌,颜银标. 断裂韧度CTOD评定技术的现状及应用[J]. 材料导报,2012,26(11):124-129. XU Bin,YAN Yinbiao. The overview of assessment technique of CTOD experiment and its application[J]. Materials Reports,2012,26(11):124-129.
[8]	曾小川,阴志英,王龙,等. 金属材料断裂韧性试验标准对比分析[J]. 核标准计量与质量,2018(2):8-12. ZENG Xiaochuan,YIN Zhiying,WANG Long,et al. Comparative analysis of fracture toughness test standards for metallic materials[J]. Nuclear Standard Metrology and Quality,2018(2):8-12.
[9]	邓彩艳,张玉凤,霍立兴,等. X65管线钢焊接接头CTOD断裂韧度[J]. 焊接学报,2003,24(3):13-16. DENG Caiyan,ZHANG Yufeng,HUO Lixing,et al. CTOD fracture toughness of welded joints of X65 pipeline steel[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution,2003,24(3):13-16.
[10]	曹军,李小巍,温志刚. CTOD断裂韧度试验在海洋平台建造中的应用[J]. 中国海上油气(工程),2004,16(2):129-131,136. CAO Jun,LI Xiaowei,WEN Zhigang. Application of CTOD fracture toughness tests in offshore oil platform fabrication[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2004,16(2):129-131,136.
[11]	苗张木,吴华方. 海洋钢结构韧性问题与CTOD试验技术[J]. 钢结构,2008,23(2):18-22. MIAO Zhangmu,WU Huafang. Toughness of offshore steel structure and ctod test techniques[J]. Steel Construction,2008,23(2):18-22.
[12]	牛爱军,毕宗岳,牛辉,等. X70厚壁海底管线钢管研制[J]. 焊管,2013,36(10):26-30,35. NIU Aijun,BI Zongyue,NIU Hui,et al. Research and development of X70 steel pipe with heavy wall thickness used in submarine pipeline[J]. Welded Pipe and Tube,2013,36(10):26-30,35.
[13]	刘文月,任毅,高红,等. X70/X80管线钢厚板低温CTOD韧性研究[J]. 焊管,2016,39(10):10-14. LIU Wenyue,REN Yi,GAO Hong,et al. Low temperature CTOD toughness research of X70/X80 thick plates used for pipeline steel[J]. Welded Pipe and Tube,2016,39(10):10-14.
[14]	武战学,党恩,刘宏亮,等. X80钢管焊接接头断裂韧性试验分析[J]. 焊管,2011,34(3):29-32. WU Zhanxue,DANG En,LIU Hongliang,et al. The analysis on fracture toughness test of X80 steel pipe welding joint[J]. Welded Pipe and Tube,2011,34(3):29-32.
[15]	苗张木,蒋军,王志坚,等. 用裂纹尖端张开位移法评价焊接接头韧性[J]. 焊管,2003,26(6):17-21,61. MIAO Zhangmu,JIANG Jun,WANG Zhijian,et al. To evaluate the toughness of welded jointer with crack tip open displacement method[J]. Welded Pipe and Tube,2003,26(6):17-21,61.
[16]	张宝昌,关安帮. 焊接接头裂纹扩展速率侧槽试验法的研究[J]. 焊接,1988(2):1-3. ZHANG Baochang,GUAN Anbang. Research on the side slot test method for crack growth rate of welded joints[J]. Welding & Joining,1988(2):1-3.
[17]	张宝昌,焦伟,纪绍信. 侧槽试样与平板试样裂纹扩展速率的关系[J]. 焊接学报,1993(1):1-6. ZHANG Baochang,JIAO Wei,JI Shaoxin. Relationship of da/dN between lateral notch specimen and plane plate specimen[J]. Transactions of the China Welding Institution,1993(1):1-6.