国内外环氧粉末外涂层标准对比

张圣光; 刘文汇; 石晨镭; 王刚

国内外环氧粉末外涂层标准对比

1. 山东胜利钢管有限公司, 山东淄博 255082;
2. 威士伯(上海)企业管理有限公司, 上海 200436

详细信息

作者简介:
张圣光(1981-),男,工程师,质量总监,主要从事钢管的无损检测、理化检测、防腐等技术管理工作。

中图分类号: TG154.5；T-65%%
计量
- 文章访问数: 10
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 9
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-08-16
- 修回日期: 2016-12-26
- 网络出版日期: 2023-12-14

Comparison between Domestic and Foreign Standards for Epoxy Powder External Coating

1. Shandong Shengli Steel Pipe Co., Ltd., Zibo 255082, China;
2. Valspar(Shanghai)Business Management Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200436, China

摘要

摘要: 简要介绍了钢管环氧粉末外涂层工艺；重点对比分析了SY/T 0315—2013和加拿大CSA Z 245.20—2014在适用范围、性能要求、生产控制和质量检测等方面的差异。对于28 d阴极剥离和28 d附着力等检测周期较长的项目，SY/T 0315—2013的做法比较容易实施；对于粉末性能和实验室涂敷试件涂层质量检测结果的时效性，以及生产过程中的型式检验中的界面污染控制，SY/T 0315—2013没有相关要求。
- 管道 /
- 防腐 /
- 涂层 /
- 熔结环氧粉末 /
- 标准 /
- 对比分析
Abstract: Briefed here in the article is the epoxy powder external coating process for steel pipes.Focused on is a comparative analysis between the Chinese standard SY/T 0315-2013 and the Canadian standard CSA Z 245.20-2014, involving such aspects as applicable scope, performance requirement, production control, and quality inspection, etc.It is identified via the analysis that for items that need a rather long inspection cycle like 28 d cathodic disbanding and 28 d adhesion, etc.it is relatively easy to adapt the method as described under SY/T 0315-2013, and that for the timeliness of the results from inspections of the powder performance, and the coating quality of the specimen in the lab, and for control of the interfacial contamination in the type inspection during the production process, there is no requirement as specified under SY/T 0315-2013.
- piping /
- anti-corrosion /
- coating /
- fusion bond epoxy powder /
- standard /
- comparative analysis